←  Market Buzz Portfolio Hub Market Buzz · Research Universe · June 2026

e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF)

Mass Beauty / Prestige Skincare · NYSE · Deep Dive Analysis — June 2, 2026
Smart Score 5 HF Score: 0.89 (Buy) Strong Buy — 12B/4H/0S
$52.31
Price (Jun 2, 2026)
$3.33B
Market Cap
−53.0%
1-Year Return
$74.93
Analyst PT (avg)
+43.3%
PT Upside
12B / 4H / 0S
Analyst Ratings
$0.44 GAAP
FY26 EPS (diluted)
70.7%
Gross Margin FY26
⚠️ Contrarian Alert — Near 52-Week Low: ELF has fallen −53% over 12 months and −65% from its all-time high of ~$220, trading near its 52-week low of $49.72. The selloff was driven by a catastrophic Q2 FY26 revenue miss (−35% stock crash), Rhode acquisition leverage, and China tariff fears. Yet the underlying business just reported its 29th consecutive quarter of growth, Rhode delivered $390M in net sales in just 8 months and is growing 80%+ YoY, and the consensus analyst PT of $74.93 implies +43% upside. This is a deep-value contrarian setup.
📈 Price Performance vs. Beauty Peers (12 Months)
12-Month Total Price Performance — Mass & Prestige Beauty Peers
TickerCompany~Jun 2025~Jun 20261Y ReturnMarket CapConsensusHF Score
ELFe.l.f. Beauty~$113.77$52.31−53.0%$3.33BStrong Buy0.89
COTYCoty Inc.~$9~$8~−11%~$6.5BBuy
ELEstée Lauder~$95~$72~−24%~$26BHold
EPCEdgewell Personal Care~$32~$28~−13%~$1.5BHold
IPARInter Parfums~$115~$105~−9%~$4.1BHold

Source: TipRanks, market data June 2026. ELF is the worst performer by far in the beauty peer group — creating potential for a sharp mean reversion if tariff fears moderate and Rhode execution continues.

📊 Analyst Consensus & Ratings
Consensus Overview
Strong Buy
12 Buy · 4 Hold · 0 Sell
Best Analyst Consensus: 5B / 2H / 0S (Buy)
Buy: 75.0%Hold: 25.0%Sell: 0%
Avg Price Target (all)$74.93
Best Analyst PT$76.29
Current Price$52.31
Implied Upside (avg)+43.3%
52-Week High$150.99
52-Week Low$49.72
Smart Score5 / 10 (Neutral)
Hedge Fund SignalBuy (0.89)
Insider SignalSell
Blogger Signal100% Bullish
Next EarningsAug 5, 2026
Key Analyst Actions (Recent)
FirmRatingPrice TargetNote
TD CowenBuyReaffirmed May '26
B. RileyBuy$70 ↓ from $130Cut May 26, '26
Consensus (12 analysts)Strong Buy$74.93 avgAs of Jun 2026
Best Analysts (7 analysts)Buy$76.29 avgTop-rated analysts
Key Analyst Observation: Zero sell ratings despite a −53% stock decline over 12 months. The street is overwhelmingly bullish and treating this as a valuation dislocation, not a structural impairment. B. Riley's PT cut to $70 still implies upside from current levels. The widening gap between the stock price (~$52) and consensus PT (~$75) suggests either the market sees risks analysts don't, or the stock is materially undervalued.
Note on PT Range: Analyst PTs vary widely — from ~$70 (B. Riley) to potentially $100+ — reflecting significant disagreement on tariff impact, Rhode ramp cadence, and organic growth recovery. The median PT across broader coverage is reportedly ~$87–118 (other data sources), suggesting the TipRanks average of $74.93 may reflect downward PT revisions post Q2 FY26 crash.
💰 5-Year Financial Trend (GAAP) — FY2022–FY2026
Profitability Verdict: ELF Beauty has grown revenue 4.2× from $392M (FY2022) to $1.636B (FY2026) while sustaining 70%+ gross margins — among the highest in consumer products. GAAP profitability compressed sharply in FY2026 due to (1) ~$60–80M of annual amortization of Rhode brand intangibles, (2) ~$50M in interest expense on $917M of acquisition debt, and (3) Rhode integration costs. The GAAP operating margin fell from 14.6% (FY2024 peak) to just 4.5% in FY2026. However, adjusted EBITDA grew 13% YoY to ~$161M and free cash flow improved to $190M — demonstrating the core business is healthy. FY2026 GAAP figures sourced from the 10-K filed May 21, 2026 with the SEC (Deloitte-audited).
Annual Revenue, Margins & Free Cash Flow — FY2022–FY2026 (GAAP unless noted)
Fiscal YearRevenueYoY GrowthGross MarginGAAP Op. MarginGAAP Net IncomeGAAP EPSAdj. EBITDAFCF
FY2022 (Mar '22)$392M64.2%7.6%$21.8M$0.41$54.6M$14.7M
FY2023 (Mar '23)$579M+47.8%67.4%11.8%$61.5M$1.11$85.3M$100M
FY2024 (Mar '24)$1,024M+76.9%70.7%14.6%$127.7M$2.21$182.6M$62.5M
FY2025 (Mar '25)$1,314M+28.3%71.2%12.0%$112.1M$1.92$206.2M$115.3M
FY2026 (Mar '26)$1,636M+24.5%70.7%4.5%$26.3M$0.44~$161M$190M

FY ends March 31. GAAP Op. Margin / Net Income sourced from EDGAR 10-K (filed May 21, 2026, audited by Deloitte). Adj. EBITDA per TipRanks non-GAAP data. The gross margin floor at 70.7% across FY24–FY26 is exceptional for a consumer goods company and reflects ELF's strong pricing power and supply chain discipline. FY2024 revenue surge reflects partial-year Naturium acquisition ($355M deal, Oct 2023). FY2026 surge reflects 8 months of Rhode ($390M net sales). FCF improved to $190M in FY2026 despite lower GAAP net income.

📉 Quarterly Earnings Beat/Miss — Last 8 Quarters
Earnings History — Adj. EPS vs. Estimate & Revenue vs. Estimate (Last 8 Quarters)
QuarterReport DateAdj. EPS (Act.)Est. EPSEPS SurpriseRevenue (Act.)Est. Rev.Rev. SurpriseStock Reaction
Q1 FY25 (Jun '24)Aug 8, '24$1.10$0.83+32.4%$324M$307M+5.8%−11.5% ⚠️
Q2 FY25 (Sep '24)Nov 6, '24$0.77$0.43+80.8%$301M$289M+4.0%+8.4%
Q3 FY25 (Dec '24)Feb 6, '25$0.74$0.76−2.4%$355M$330M+7.5%−18.5% ⚠️
Q4 FY25 (Mar '25)May 28, '25$0.78$0.72+8.2%$333M$327M+1.8%+21.9% 🚀
Q1 FY26 (Jun '25)Aug 6, '25$0.89$0.84+6.5%$354M$352M+0.5%−9.0%
Q2 FY26 (Sep '25)Nov 5, '25$0.68$0.57+19.9%$344M$366M−6.0% MISS−35.3% 💥
Q3 FY26 (Dec '25)Feb 4, '26$1.24$0.72+71.5%$490M$462M+6.0%−9.4%
Q4 FY26 (Mar '26)May 20, '26$0.32$0.29+8.8%$449M$423M+6.2%+0.3%

EPS figures are non-GAAP adjusted (consistent with company press releases). GAAP EPS for full FY2026 was $0.44. Avg absolute post-earnings price reaction: 14.3% — ELF has high earnings day volatility. The Q2 FY26 revenue miss was the primary catalyst for the stock's crash, as organic ELF growth decelerated while the market had expected Rhode to meaningfully supplement. Q4 FY26 marked the 29th consecutive quarter of net sales growth. Next earnings: Aug 5, 2026.

🏢 Business Overview — What ELF Does

Core Business: Mass Beauty Disruption

e.l.f. Beauty was founded in 2004 with a radical idea: offer prestige-quality beauty products at drugstore prices — often $10–15 per item. The company has systematically exploited the "dupe economy," where beauty consumers seek high-performance alternatives to $50–80 luxury products. ELF's brand portfolio spans:

  • e.l.f. Cosmetics — flagship mass color brand, #1 in U.S. mass by NIQ data
  • e.l.f. SKIN — skincare sub-brand; grew from #25 to #11 in U.S. mass skincare
  • Well People — clean beauty brand (acquired 2020)
  • Keys Soulcare — lifestyle wellness brand (Alicia Keys collab)
  • Naturium — premium skincare (acquired Oct 2023, $355M deal)
  • rhode — luxury skincare (Hailey Bieber; acquired Aug 2025, $1B deal)
U.S. Mass Beauty Rank#1 (NIQ 2025)
Consecutive Growth Qtrs29 quarters
Speed-to-Market13–20 weeks
International Revenue~22% of total
Key Retail PartnersUlta, Walmart, Target, CVS

rhode: The Game-Changer Acquisition

ELF announced the acquisition of rhode skin — Hailey Bieber's luxury skincare brand — on May 28, 2025, closing on August 5, 2025. The deal structure:

  • Total deal value: Up to ~$1B ($800M at close + $200M earnout)
  • At close: $600M cash + $200M in ELF stock
  • Earnout: $200M based on 3-year growth targets
  • Revenue at deal (LTM Mar '25): $212M net sales
  • FY2026 net sales: $390M in just 8 months (Aug '25–Mar '26)
  • FY2026 global retail sales: $500M+
  • YoY growth: 80%+
🚀 rhode Performance Highlights:
• Became #1 beauty brand at Sephora North America
• Launched at Sephora UK, Mecca (Australia/NZ) in FY2026
• Sephora Europe launch (19 countries) planned Sep 2026
• Annualized run rate: ~$585M+ based on 8-month $390M figure
• Earnout milestones tracking to be paid (increases Rhode liability but signals outperformance)
🌏 China Tariff Exposure — The Elephant in the Room

Current Tariff Situation

China manufacturing share~75% of volume
Tariff rate on China cosmetics~55% total
Breakdown25% Section 301 + 30% incremental
Annualized cost impact~$50M (stated by mgmt)
EPS impact (est.)~$0.85/share
FY27 guidance given?No (tariff uncertainty)
Mgmt diversification targetSignificantly <75% by FY27 exit

Mitigation Strategies

Supply Chain Diversification: Moving production to Vietnam and Mexico via partnerships with key Chinese suppliers who are setting up operations in alternative countries — targeting "significantly less" China concentration by end of FY2027.
Supplier Concessions: Negotiating manufacturing cost reductions and packaging efficiencies to absorb a portion of tariff costs without full pass-through to consumers.
Selective Pricing: ELF's extreme value-for-money positioning gives it some room to take targeted SKU price increases (already tested successfully in prior years) without losing its core consumer.
Legal / Policy Tailwind: On Feb 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated prior IEEPA tariffs — creating ongoing legal uncertainty about tariff sustainability. Any reduction in tariff rates would be a direct positive catalyst.
🎯 Catalysts & Risks
Key Upside Catalysts
1. rhode International Expansion: Sephora Europe launch (19 countries, Sep 2026) could add $100M+ incrementally within 12–18 months. rhode is already the #1 brand at Sephora North America — the playbook is proven.
2. Tariff Resolution: Any reduction in China tariff rates — or faster-than-expected diversification to Vietnam/Mexico — directly improves margins and would likely be worth $10–20/share in re-rating. The Supreme Court ruling creates ongoing uncertainty about tariff durability.
3. Organic ELF Core Recovery: Q4 FY26 showed organic ELF growth ~1% ex-Rhode. A return to mid-single-digit organic growth in FY27 would exceed guidance and signal the brand has stabilized after the Q2 FY26 disruption.
4. Margin Recovery Story: As Rhode integration costs normalize and debt is paid down, adjusted operating margins should recover toward 12–15% by FY2028 — driving a significant EPS step-up and P/E re-rating.
5. e.l.f. SKIN Scaling: SKIN moved from #25 to #11 in U.S. mass skincare over 5 years — with Naturium and now rhode in the portfolio, ELF is building a formidable skincare house that could rival its color business in size.
6. Value Brand Positioning in Inflation Era: Consumer trading-down trends and "dupe culture" structurally benefit ELF. When prestige brands are $50–80, ELF's $10–15 alternatives look better than ever to value-seeking consumers.
Key Downside Risks
1. Tariff Escalation: At 55% tariffs on China goods, ELF faces $50M/year impact. If tariffs reach 80–100% before supply chain diversification is complete, the impact could balloon to $80–100M — potentially wiping out most of FY27 profitability.
2. rhode Integration Risk: ELF paid ~$1B for a 3-year-old celebrity-founded brand. "Founder-led" brands often lose momentum after acquisition. If Hailey Bieber disengages from rhode post-sale, brand relevance could fade faster than expected.
3. Leverage: $917M in debt on a $3.33B market cap company = 27.5% debt/market cap ratio. In a rising rate or credit-tightening environment, refinancing risk increases. Interest expense (~$50M/year) is a persistent EPS drag.
4. Organic Growth Deceleration: Ex-Rhode, Q4 FY26 organic growth was only +1%. The core ELF brand may have saturated its core consumer base and faces rising competition from private-label drugstore brands and other dupes of the original dupe brand.
5. Insider Selling: TipRanks flags a Sell insider sentiment signal. Concentrated insider selling at sub-$60 levels would be a worrying signal that insiders see limited near-term upside.
6. Consumer Macro Risk: Despite ELF's value positioning, a severe consumer spending recession could reduce discretionary beauty purchases across mass and prestige channels simultaneously, compressing volume growth.
🐂🐻 Bulls vs. Bears
Bull Case — The Contrarian Thesis
Stock at Distressed Levels: ELF is down 65% from its all-time high and 53% over 12 months — yet its underlying business is growing 25% YoY with 70%+ gross margins. The sell-off has created a classic "throw the baby out with the bathwater" scenario.
rhode is a Megabrand in the Making: $390M in net sales in just 8 months, growing 80%+ YoY, already the #1 brand at Sephora North America — rhode is dramatically outperforming the acquisition case. At this trajectory, rhode could be a $700M–$1B brand by FY2028, making the $1B acquisition price look cheap.
FCF Validates the Model: Despite GAAP net income compression to $26.3M, free cash flow improved to $190M in FY2026. Cash flow tells the true story of the business, and it's very healthy.
Valuation Extremely Compressed: At 2.4× EV/Revenue and ~25× adj. EV/EBITDA on a business growing 25% with 70%+ gross margins, ELF is trading at a significant discount to comparable premium consumer brands. Applying even 15× adj. EV/EBITDA on FY27E yields ~$85–90/share.
Tariff Fears Already Priced In: The $50M tariff impact represents ~$0.85/share hit. At $52/share, investors are effectively getting the growing rhode business and the core ELF brand at nearly zero premium for a globally recognized #1 mass beauty brand.
Bear Case — The Cautious View
rhode Carries Concentration Risk: ELF's growth story now heavily depends on a 3-year-old brand built on social media hype and one celebrity. If the hype cycle fades — as it has for countless DTC beauty brands — rhode's 80% growth rate will not be sustained, and the $1B acquisition will look expensive in retrospect.
Debt Burden Limits Flexibility: With $917M in debt, ELF has limited capacity for further acquisitions, buybacks, or investment in the core brand without additional fundraising. The earnout on rhode could add another $200M of liability if milestones are hit.
Core Brand Commoditization: ELF disrupted prestige beauty. Now ELF itself faces disruption from even cheaper private-label brands at Walmart, Target, and Amazon. The "dupe of the dupe" risk is real and growing.
Guidance Lacks Conviction: Management refused to give FY2027 EPS guidance due to tariff uncertainty. This signals limited visibility and makes it difficult for investors to model a bull case with confidence — especially given the leverage in the capital structure.
📡 Technical Analysis
Technical Summary — Daily Timeframe (June 1, 2026)
Strong Sell
Overall Technical Signal
1 Buy · 6 Neutral · 15 Sell
RSI (14)40.1 — Approaching Oversold
MACD (12,26,9)−2.38 — Sell
Williams %R (14)−62.5 — Buy Signal
Stochastics58.8 — Neutral
ADX (14)23.4 — Moderate Trend
Moving Averages (all)12/12 Sell
Technical Verdict: ELF is in a severe downtrend. The stock is −42% below its 200-day SMA ($90.54) and −15% below its 50-day SMA ($61.58). All 12 simple and exponential moving averages give Sell signals. The RSI at 40 is not yet at traditional oversold levels (30), but approaching. Williams %R gives a lone Buy signal — suggesting the stock may be overextended to the downside. No technical entry signal yet; wait for RSI <30 or price stabilization above the 52-week low of $49.72.
Moving Averages & Pivot Points
IndicatorLevelvs. Current ($52.31)Signal
SMA 5$55.68−6.4%Sell
SMA 10$54.30−3.8%Sell
SMA 20$56.24−7.5%Sell
SMA 50$61.58−17.7%Sell
SMA 100$72.77−39.1%Sell
SMA 200$90.54−72.9%Sell
Classic S1$55.38−5.9%Support
Classic R1$56.98+8.9%Resistance
52W Low$49.72−5.0%Watch
52W High$150.99−188.6%

ELF trading near 52-week low of $49.72 — a breach of this level would be a technical breakdown signal and could trigger further algorithmic selling. Holding above $49.72 is critical in the near term.

🏆 TipRanks Smart Score Breakdown
5
Smart Score
Neutral (out of 10)

Smart Score of 5 reflects a split signal: strong institutional support and bullish sentiment offset by poor technicals and insider selling. Updated May 29, 2026.

Buy
Analyst Consensus
12B/4H/0S
Buy
Hedge Funds
Score: 0.89
Bullish
Bloggers
100% bullish
Positive
News Sentiment
Score: 1.0
Sell
Technicals
Strong Sell
Sell
Insider Activity
Score: 0.0
Smart Score Interpretation: The neutral Smart Score of 5 masks a very polarized signal set. Institutional and sentiment signals are strongly bullish (hedge funds buying, bloggers 100% bullish, analyst consensus Strong Buy with 0 sells). However, technicals are the worst possible (Strong Sell across all MAs) and insiders have been selling. This is characteristic of a deep-value setup where fundamentals have diverged from price — a pattern historically associated with mean reversion once a catalyst emerges.
📰 Recent News & Analyst Actions
TD Cowen Sticks to Its Buy Rating for e.l.f. Beauty (ELF)
TipRanks News · May 26, 2026 · Positive
Elf Beauty price target lowered to $70 from $130 at B. Riley
The Fly · May 26, 2026 · Negative — PT slashed but rating maintained as Buy; still implies +34% upside
Why e.l.f. Beauty Stock Is Surging Again
TipRanks News · May 27, 2026 · Positive — Post-Q4 beat bounce; ELF briefly recovered from 52W lows
Is e.l.f. Beauty Stock a Buy as Rhode Drives Growth?
Motley Fool · May 24, 2026 · Positive — Rhode's $390M FY26 net sales and Sephora leadership cited as core thesis
e.l.f. Beauty Ramps Up Investor Engagement With Four Major Conferences — Community and Transparency Take Center Stage
Market Chameleon · May 27, 2026 · Neutral — Management actively engaging the investment community post-earnings
What to Know About This Fund's $4.8 Million e.l.f. Beauty Exit After a Tough Year
The Motley Fool · May 29, 2026 · Neutral — Institutional selling after difficult year; some forced selling from de-risking
ELF Stock Surges Over 10% Premarket After Q4 Earnings — Retail Traders Call Stock 'Dirt Cheap'
StockTwits · May 2026 · Positive — Q4 FY26 earnings beat drives initial relief; organic retail sentiment very bullish
💡 Investment Summary & Valuation Context
EV / Revenue (FY26)
2.4×
EV ~$3.96B / Rev $1.636B
Very cheap for 70% GM brand
EV / Adj. EBITDA (FY26)
24.6×
EV $3.96B / Adj. EBITDA ~$161M
Elevated but declining as margins recover
FCF Yield
5.7%
FCF $190M / EV $3.96B
Strong and improving cash generation
Investment Thesis Summary: e.l.f. Beauty is a structurally superior consumer brand trading at a distressed valuation after a confluence of negative catalysts — a Q2 FY26 revenue miss, the financial overhang from the $1B rhode acquisition, and ongoing China tariff fears. The market is pricing in continued pain, but the evidence points the other way: rhode is dramatically outperforming expectations ($390M in 8 months, 80% YoY growth), free cash flow improved to $190M despite integration costs, and the core e.l.f. brand remains the #1 mass beauty brand in the U.S. for the 29th consecutive quarter. At 2.4× EV/Revenue with FY27 guidance of $1.84–1.87B (+12–14%), ELF offers a compelling risk/reward for patient investors willing to look through the tariff and integration noise. The consensus analyst PT of $74.93 — from 12 analysts with zero sells — implies 43% upside. Rating: BUY · Internal Price Target: $75.
Market Buzz Research Universe · ELF Deep Dive · June 2, 2026 · Source: TipRanks, SEC EDGAR (10-K filed 2026-05-21, audited by Deloitte), company press releases, web search · For informational purposes only. Not investment advice.